Free GRE practice test — 54 questions at real section timing
One GRE paper in the real exam format: 54 questions across 4 timed sections, 1 hr 28 min on a server-controlled clock.
About the real exam One 1h 58m exam, doors to graduate, business and law schools worldwide.
Free, reversible until you begin · one attempt per account · no retake, no card.
The paper, section by section
| # | Section | Questions | Time | Marking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Verbal Reasoning — Section 1 | 12 | 18 min | +1 per correct answer, no negative marking |
| 02 | Quantitative Reasoning — Section 1 Calculator | 12 | 21 min | +1 per correct answer, no negative marking |
| 03 | Verbal Reasoning — Section 2 | 15 | 23 min | +1 per correct answer, no negative marking |
| 04 | Quantitative Reasoning — Section 2 Calculator | 15 | 26 min | +1 per correct answer, no negative marking |
| Whole paper | 54 | 1 hr 28 min | 54 marks |
Navigation: sections run strictly in order and a completed section cannot be reopened.
Sample questions with worked answers
8 original practice questions written by Myndaq in the GRE style. They are not taken from this mock paper or from official past papers. Try each one, then open the answer.
- Question 1Verbal ReasoningOne correct answer
Although the panel's report was widely praised for its thoroughness, several department heads complained that its recommendations were so ______ that no one could act on them without requesting further guidance.
- prescriptive
- nebulous
- contentious
- exhaustive
- remunerative
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B
The clause after 'so' must explain why the recommendations could not be acted on: they were unclear. 'Nebulous' means vague or ill-defined, which fits exactly, and the 'Although' signals a contrast with the praise for thoroughness.
'Prescriptive' is the opposite of what is needed, since prescriptive recommendations tell you precisely what to do. 'Exhaustive' merely restates the thoroughness instead of contrasting with it. 'Contentious' would mean disputed, which is a reason to argue about the recommendations rather than a reason they cannot be carried out, and 'remunerative' (profitable) is unrelated to the sentence.
- Question 2Verbal ReasoningOne or more correct answers
Select the TWO answer choices that, when used to complete the sentence, fit the meaning of the sentence as a whole and produce completed sentences that are alike in meaning.
Far from being the iconoclast his admirers describe, the architect was in truth thoroughly ______, borrowing without embarrassment from the very traditions he claimed to disdain.
- derivative
- unorthodox
- imitative
- austere
- meticulous
- reclusive
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A, C
The second half of the sentence says the architect borrowed from existing traditions, and 'Far from being the iconoclast' tells us the blank must contradict originality. 'Derivative' and 'imitative' both mean taking from the work of others, so either one produces the same sentence meaning.
'Unorthodox' says the opposite of what the sentence establishes. 'Austere', 'meticulous' and 'reclusive' describe plausible traits of an architect, but none of them pairs with another option to give two sentences alike in meaning, which is what this item type requires.
- Question 3Verbal ReasoningOne correct answer
For decades the dark bands in the shells of deep-sea clams were read as annual growth marks, and their spacing was used to reconstruct centuries of bottom-water temperature. Recent work complicates that reading. When Vasquez and her colleagues reared clams of the same species in tanks held at a constant temperature, the animals still laid down bands, but at irregular intervals that tracked the timing of the food pulses the researchers delivered rather than any seasonal cycle.
The finding does not overturn the older reconstructions outright. In the open ocean the supply of food sinking to the sea floor is itself largely seasonal, so bands may still form roughly once a year. What the experiment suggests is that a band records the arrival of food rather than the passing of a year, and that where surface productivity is erratic the resulting chronologies may be distorted in ways no one has yet measured.
The passage suggests which of the following about the older temperature reconstructions?
- They are invalid, because the bands on which they rest do not form on an annual schedule.
- They may remain approximately sound in waters where food reaches the sea floor on a seasonal schedule.
- They relied on a clam species that does not produce bands outside its natural habitat.
- They understated bottom-water temperatures in regions where surface productivity is erratic.
- They could be corrected by measuring the spacing of the bands rather than counting them.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B
The second paragraph states that the finding does not overturn the older work outright, because open-ocean food supply is itself largely seasonal, so bands may still form about once a year. That is precisely the qualified endorsement in the second option.
The first option is too strong and is contradicted by that same sentence. The third is false: the captive clams did lay down bands. The fourth names a direction of error, understatement, that the passage never specifies; it says only that chronologies may be distorted. The fifth invents a remedy the passage does not offer, and in any case the older method already used spacing.
- Question 4Verbal ReasoningOne correct answer
A city council has proposed easing downtown traffic congestion by closing two municipal parking garages and replacing them with public gardens. Supporters of the plan point out that vehicles circling in search of a scarce space make up a substantial share of downtown traffic; remove the spaces, they argue, and the circling will disappear with them.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the supporters' argument?
- The two garages are among the oldest structures still standing downtown.
- Drivers turned away from the garages would continue into the district and search the surrounding streets for curbside spaces.
- Public gardens in comparable cities have measurably increased foot traffic on adjoining blocks.
- A council survey found that most downtown visitors already arrive by car rather than by transit.
- Building the two gardens would take roughly eighteen months from the first day of demolition.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B
The argument assumes that drivers who cannot park in the garages will stop coming downtown. The second option denies that assumption directly: the same drivers arrive and circle the streets instead, so removing the spaces makes the searching worse rather than eliminating it.
The age of the garages is beside the point. Increased foot traffic concerns pedestrians, not vehicle congestion. The survey finding that most visitors drive supports the premise that circling matters rather than undermining the conclusion. The eighteen-month construction period speaks to a temporary inconvenience, not to whether the finished plan would reduce congestion.
- Question 5Quantitative ReasoningOne correct answer
The integer n is greater than 1, and n² is a multiple of 12.
Quantity A: the least possible value of n Quantity B: 6
- Quantity A is greater.
- Quantity B is greater.
- The two quantities are equal.
- The relationship cannot be determined from the information given.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C
Write 12 as 2² × 3. If n² is divisible by 3, then 3 divides n, because 3 is prime. If n² is divisible by 4, then n must be even, since the square of an odd number is odd. So n is divisible by both 2 and 3, hence by 6.
The smallest such n greater than 1 is 6 itself, and 6² = 36 = 12 × 3 is indeed a multiple of 12. Quantity A equals 6, so the quantities are equal. A common trap is to try n = 4 or n = 2, but 16 and 4 are not multiples of 12; another is to conclude that n² divisible by 12 forces n divisible by 12, which the case n = 6 disproves.
- Question 6Quantitative ReasoningOne correct answer
A tank holds 40 liters of a solution that is 15 percent acid by volume. How many liters of pure acid must be added, with no other change to the contents, so that the resulting solution is 32 percent acid by volume?
- 6.8
- 8
- 10
- 12.5
- 17
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C
The tank starts with 0.15 × 40 = 6 liters of acid in 40 liters of solution. Adding x liters of pure acid raises the acid to 6 + x and the total volume to 40 + x.
Set (6 + x)/(40 + x) = 0.32, so 6 + x = 12.8 + 0.32x, giving 0.68x = 6.8 and x = 10. Check: 16 liters of acid in 50 liters is 32 percent. The choice 6.8 comes from stopping at 0.68x = 6.8 without dividing. The choice 17 comes from reading the 17-point gap between 15 percent and 32 percent as a number of liters. Adding 8 liters leaves 14 liters of acid in 48, about 29 percent, still short of the target, while adding 12.5 liters gives 18.5 in 52.5, about 35 percent, which overshoots it.
- Question 7Quantitative ReasoningType a numeric answer
Each of the 180 commuters in a survey was asked which services they had used during the past week. In all, 96 reported using the train, 74 reported using the bus, and 23 reported using both. How many of the commuters used neither the train nor the bus?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: 33
By the inclusion-exclusion principle, the number who used at least one of the two services is 96 + 74 - 23 = 147, since the 23 who used both were counted once in each of the first two figures.
The remaining commuters used neither, so the answer is 180 - 147 = 33. Forgetting to subtract the overlap gives 170 and an answer of 10, which double-counts the 23 commuters who used both.
- Question 8Quantitative ReasoningOne correct answer
If 3^(2k+1) = 27^(k-1), what is the value of k?
- -4
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 6
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D
Rewrite both sides with base 3. Since 27 = 3³, the right side is 3^(3(k-1)) = 3^(3k-3).
The exponential function with base 3 is one-to-one, so the exponents must match: 2k + 1 = 3k - 3, which gives k = 4. Check: the left side is 3^9 and the right side is 27^3 = (3³)³ = 3^9, so the two agree. The value 2 comes from setting 2k + 1 = 3k - 1, and -4 from a sign slip when moving 3k across the equation.
What you get back
You get your raw marks and per-section scores. No scaled score, band, rank or percentile is estimated for this paper.
- Scored out of 54 raw marks, with per-section totals.
- There is no negative marking anywhere in this paper.
How the real GRE is scored
Scored on three separate scales. Verbal Reasoning 130-170 and Quantitative Reasoning 130-170 are reported in 1-point increments; Analytical Writing is scored 0-6 in half-point increments. There is no official total — V and Q add up to 260-340. Strong scores depend heavily on programme and country.
- 310-319Competitive at most well-regarded graduate programmes worldwide. Comfortable range for mid-tier and applied-science master's programmes.
- 300-309Average to good for many graduate programmes. Sufficient for a wide range of admissions, especially when paired with strong academics and experience.
- AW 4.5+Strong writing band, valued for humanities, social-science and policy programmes. AW 3.5-4.0 is acceptable at most STEM programmes.
Context only - this free mock returns: You get your raw marks and per-section scores. No scaled score, band, rank or percentile is estimated for this paper.
What the GRE asks of you
The GRE General Test is the world's most widely accepted standardized exam for graduate, MBA, specialised master's and law admissions. Owned and administered by ETS, it tests Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Analytical Writing on a single 1h 58m computer-based test, taken year-round at 1,000+ test centres across 160+ countries or at home with live proctoring. Scores are accepted by graduate programmes globally and are valid for five years.
Five sections in a fixed order — Analytical Writing first, then Verbal and Quantitative alternating. Analytical Writing is one Analyze-an-Issue essay (30 min). Verbal Reasoning has two sections — 12 questions in 18 min, then 15 in 23 min — testing text completion, sentence equivalence and reading comprehension. Quantitative Reasoning has two sections — 12 questions in 21 min, then 15 in 26 min — covering arithmetic, algebra, geometry and data analysis. An on-screen four-function calculator with square root is provided for Quant only. The test is section-level adaptive — performance on the first Verbal/Quant section sets the difficulty of the second.
Who sits the GRE
- MBA and specialised master's applicants whose target business schools accept GRE in place of GMAT (most top-100 programmes do).
- Working professionals planning a return to higher education within the next 5 years (score validity window).
- STEM students for whom strong Quant scores can directly influence scholarship and graduate-assistantship decisions.
How people prepare for it
- 1Start with a full timed diagnostic mock to set a baseline V/Q score and surface weak chapters.
- 2Build a strong academic vocabulary base — text completion and sentence equivalence reward precise word knowledge. Use spaced repetition daily.
- 3Drill quantitative comparison, problem solving and numeric entry — the math is roughly Class 10 difficulty but the question framing trips up most test-takers.
- 4Write at least 8 timed Issue essays before test day — structure, evidence and clock discipline matter more than fancy vocabulary.
Figures about the real exam, as recorded in the Myndaq course. They describe the real sitting, not this free mock paper - check current details with the exam body before you book.
What it opens up
- Admission to graduate, business and law programmes at universities worldwide.
- Eligibility for fellowships, scholarships and graduate assistantships where strong scores can directly fund tuition.
- Five-year score validity — applies across multiple application cycles.
- Free score reports to 4 institutions on test day; additional reports sent later for ~USD 35-40 per recipient.
Figures above are as reported for the cycle named in each row and are refreshed each cycle. Sourced, dated facts for this exam (official links on every row) are on the GRE course page.
How this mirrors the real format
- The paper structure is the real format: 4 sections in exam order, 54 questions in total.
- Timing is server-controlled for the full 1 hr 28 min -- closing the tab does not pause the clock, exactly like our paid mock series.
- Marking follows the published paper: the per-section marks shown in the paper map are the marks the scorer applies.
- Sections run strictly in order and a completed section cannot be reopened.
- An on-screen calculator is provided in the sections where the exam allows one.
"Real format" means the paper shape, timing, marking and navigation above - not the official exam software, its visual identity, or any affiliation with the exam body.
What differs or is limited
- This free mock follows the same paper shape, timing, marking scheme and navigation as our paid GRE General Test mock series. It is scored automatically. It does not include tutor explanations, analysis dashboards or practice content.
- The Analytical Writing essay is not part of this mock, matching our paid GRE mock.
Device and setup checklist
- A stable internet connection for the full duration.
- An on-screen calculator is provided where the exam allows one.
- A laptop or desktop is recommended for the closest exam experience.
One attempt, explicitly
Adding this mock to your account is free and reversible - you can change the exam any time before you begin. Only the confirmed Begin action uses your one attempt. No retake, no reset, no card.