Separate premises from conclusions
Restate what the argument claims and what supports it. Identify the gap before evaluating an answer choice.
LSAT / PREPARATION ON MYNDAQ
Prepare for the LSAT by making reasoning visible. Work on how arguments are built and how a passage’s claims fit together, then apply the method under timed conditions.
One free mock for one eligible exam per account · Sign-in required · No card
Baseline source review · ↗
EXAM ESSENTIALS
YOUR PREPARATION PRIORITIES

Restate what the argument claims and what supports it. Identify the gap before evaluating an answer choice.
Strengthen, weaken, assumption and inference tasks ask different things. Decide what a correct answer must do before looking for familiar words.
Track viewpoints, shifts and the relationship between paragraphs. Use the passage to resolve the answer rather than relying on outside knowledge.
INSIDE MYNDAQ
Read the explanation, ask the AI tutor for help and revisit the concept behind the mistake. Course counts below come from the live catalogue.
LSAT
Practice → Review → ApplyRestate what the argument claims and what supports it. Identify the gap before evaluating an answer choice.
Find the guide you need next. ↗YOUR PRACTICE ROUTINE
Begin with an argument or passage and label its claim, support and qualifications. Practise distinguishing what must follow from what is merely plausible.
Work on one question purpose at a time. State what a correct answer needs to achieve before comparing the options.
Review a mixed timed set by the reasoning gap you missed. Reconstruct the argument in your own words and test the same principle with another question.
YOUR RESOURCE LIBRARY
YOUR NEXT STEP
Build a preparation routine for LSAT. Use focused practice, explanations and the AI tutor to understand what needs your attention next.
Taken from the 874-item LSAT bank on Myndaq. Work it here; sign in (Google or email link, no card) to check each answer and have the AI tutor explain why the other options are wrong.
Passage A When a firm pollutes a river, the harm falls on downstream users who never consented to bear it. Economists call such spillovers externalities, and the classic remedy is a corrective tax equal to the marginal damage imposed on third parties. Once the polluter must pay for each unit of harm it creates, its private cost aligns with the true social cost, and it will curtail production to the level society would choose if the injured parties could bargain freely. The tax does not forbid pollution; it prices it. A firm that still finds it profitable to emit after paying the tax is, by hypothesis, generating value that exceeds the damage. The state's task is therefore not to eliminate the activity but to measure the damage accurately and let the price signal do the rest. Passage B The appeal of a pollution tax rests on a heroic premise: that a regulator can know the marginal damage of an emission. In practice, harm varies with wind, water flow, the number and vulnerability of those downstream, and interactions among pollutants that no agency can track in real time. A tax set too low licenses excessive harm; set too high, it needlessly destroys valuable output. Worse, the tax treats all victims as interchangeable holders of a monetized claim, when many would refuse any payment for a poisoned well. Assigning enforceable rights to the injured and letting them enjoin the polluter respects that refusal. Bargaining may then reallocate the right, but only on terms the rightholder accepts. The question is not merely how much pollution, but who decides.
Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between the two passages?
The two passages differ most fundamentally over which one of the following?
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of Passage B?
According to Passage A, a firm that continues to emit after paying the corrective tax
The reference in Passage B to a 'poisoned well' functions primarily to
THE NEXT STEP IN YOUR PREPARATION
Practical tools, detailed guides and related courses — find what you need for your next session.
THE FACTS BEHIND THE TEST
The LSAT is LSAC's admission test for law schools in the United States, Canada and some other countries, scored 120–180 and offered several times a year. This page covers the LSAT, not LSAT—India, which is a separate Pearson VUE-delivered test for Indian law colleges with its own dates and scoring.
10-minute break between sections two and three
Registration closes about six weeks before each window; scores release about three weeks after
Dates and fees can change. Later source checks are dated beside the relevant fact; other facts retain the baseline review date. Confirm current details on the linked official page. Myndaq is not affiliated with the exam body.
Four 35-minute multiple-choice sections: two scored Logical Reasoning, one scored Reading Comprehension and one unscored section that can be either type in any position, with a 10-minute break after section two. Logic Games are gone. A separate 50-minute Argumentative Writing sample is unscored but required before your score is released.
LSAC lists 9 to 12 September 2026, 7 to 10 October, 11 to 14 November, then 13 to 16 January 2027, 12 to 13 February, 8 to 10 April and 9 to 12 June 2027. Registration closes roughly six weeks before each window and scores release about three weeks after it, for example 28 October for the October test.
Mostly not. LSAC says it is moving toward in-centre testing for almost all test takers, with very limited exceptions such as approved accommodations or living more than 180 miles from a Prometric centre. Plan for a test-centre day, with ID, arrival time and centre rules replacing the old home-proctoring checklist.
Registration for the September 2026 LSAT is US$253. The optional Score Preview, which lets you see your score before deciding whether to keep it, costs US$46 if bought early or US$87 later. Credential Assembly Service and score reports are billed separately by LSAC.
It is unscored, but LSAC will not release your score to you or to law schools until a completed writing sample is on file. You can take it online from eight days before your multiple-choice test and have up to one year to complete it, with 15 minutes of prewriting analysis and 35 minutes of writing for most candidates.
Five times within the current reportable score period and seven times in a lifetime, and anyone who has scored 180 may not retake. Every administration you sit counts, so use full-length practice tests to judge readiness rather than treating a real date as a trial run.
Yes, one attempt per account and no card: 102 original questions written to the current two-LR, one-RC format in four 35-minute sections on a real clock, with an AI tutor explanation for every item. It does not include the writing sample and reports raw and per-section marks, not a 120 to 180 estimate. LSAC's LawHub also offers official free PrepTests. See free mock tests →
Practice across Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, Argumentative Writing with an AI tutor that explains every answer, plus progress analytics.
Myndaq runs a free mock test programme. Availability varies by exam and publication status — check the free mock tests page. One attempt per account, for one eligible exam; sign in with Google or an email link, no payment card required. See free mock tests →