Myndaq AI
Home

🇺🇸 LSAT · 4 × 35-min sections · scored 120–180

Every question is an argument.
Learn to take it apart.

The LSAT is premises, inferences and conclusions all the way down — two scored Logical Reasoning sections, one scored Reading Comprehension, one unscored variable. Argument skill is trainable, and Myndaq trains it with an explanation on every answer.

8 chapters · 20 modules · 870+ practice items — live today

About the exam

The LSAT, mapped as an argument

The current LSAT (LSAC) is four 35-minute multiple-choice sections — two scored Logical Reasoning, one scored Reading Comprehension, and one unscored variable section that looks like either. Logic Games left the test in August 2024. A separate 50-minute LSAT Argumentative Writing piece is unscored but must be on file, and from August 2026 the test is delivered in test centres only.

PREMISE
4 × 35 min
multiple-choice sections in one sitting
PREMISE
2 LR + 1 RC
scored sections, plus 1 unscored variable
PREMISE
50 min writing
Argumentative Writing — 15 read + 35 write, unscored but required
∴ CONCLUSION
120–180
one scaled score — the number law schools read

What you face

Three branches, one skill

Logical Reasoning

2 SCORED SECTIONS · 35 MIN EACH

Short arguments, one question each. Find the conclusion, expose the assumption, pick the answer that does exactly what the stem asks — under the clock. This is the heart of the score: every LR question type is drilled here with an explanation on every answer.

strengthen weaken flaw assumption inference

Reading Comprehension

1 SCORED SECTION · 35 MIN

Dense scholarly passages read the LSAT way: argument structure first, details second. What is the author's conclusion, what is stated versus implied, and which answer stays inside the text? The same argument map, applied at passage length.

LSAT Argumentative Writing

50 MIN · 15 READ + 35 WRITE · UNSCORED, REQUIRED

Separate from test day: you build and defend a position in writing. No score, but law schools see it — and it must be on file before results release. Treat it as the argument map in reverse: you construct instead of dissect.

Inside Myndaq

From premise to score — how the training runs

DRILL · LOGICAL REASONING · Q 6/10 5 CORRECT
The columnist concludes the festival caused the rise in bookshop sales. Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
A · The festival ran for two weekends B · Sales rose identically in towns with no festival C · Some attendees bought no books
STEP A · PREMISE

Drill the argument, type by type

Ten-question sessions built around the stems that actually appear — strengthen, weaken, flaw, assumption, inference. Instant scoring, and an explanation that names the argument's structure, not just the right letter.

STEP B · INFERENCE

Debrief with a tutor that maps the argument

The Myndaq Tutor sees the exact question on your screen. It walks the premise-to-conclusion chain with you, shows where the trap answer breaks the chain — and never just hands you the key.

MYNDAQ TUTOR · ON THIS QUESTION LIVE
I picked C. Why is it wrong?
C attacks something the argument never claims. Look at the conclusion again — what exactly is it saying caused the sales rise? Now check: does C touch that causal link, or something beside it?

Guides your reasoning. Never spoils the answer.

STEP C · ∴ CONCLUSION

Watch the conclusion move

Your accuracy maps onto the 120–180 scale as a live readiness read, with your weakest question types ranked and the next set queued from them. Days-to-test sits beside it, so the plan writes itself.

Why Myndaq

Four supporting premises

AI tutor on every question

Ask why the trap answer fails, right on the question. It explains the reasoning — never just the key.

The real task formats

LR stems and RC passages in the shapes the test uses — 35-minute-section thinking, drilled daily.

Weakness-first analytics

Your weakest stems surface first; practice rebuilds itself around them, attempt after attempt.

Study anywhere

Phone, tablet or laptop — progress syncs. Ten minutes in a queue is one LR set.

How it works

A valid argument for your score

P1

Practice in short sessions

Ten questions at a time, matched to your level. Instant scoring, instant explanations.

P2

Work every section's format

LR stems and RC passages in the real shapes — so nothing on test day reads unfamiliar.

Fix weak stems with the tutor

Debrief every miss, then let Myndaq queue a set built from your weakest question types.

FAQ

Six inferences before you register

What replaced Logic Games on the LSAT?

Nothing new — since August 2024 the test is two scored Logical Reasoning sections, one scored Reading Comprehension, and one unscored variable section. Argument skill carries more of the score than ever.

How is the LSAT scored?

On a 120–180 scale, from your scored multiple-choice sections. The variable section doesn't count — but you won't know which one it was.

Is LSAT Writing scored?

No — LSAT Argumentative Writing (50 minutes: 15 to read, 35 to write) is unscored, but it must be on file, and law schools can read it.

Can I take the LSAT at home?

From August 2026 the LSAT is delivered in test centres only — plan your registration around a centre seat.

Is Logical Reasoning really trainable?

Yes — LR stems repeat in patterns. Drill each type with an explanation that names the structure, and the patterns start jumping off the page. That's this course's whole thesis.

Can I start preparing free?

Yes — sign up free with Google, explore the course and chat with the AI tutor, no card needed. Go Pro when you want full practice and AI scoring.

Pricing

Start free. Upgrade when it clicks.

Start free — no card needed. Explore the course and chat with the AI tutor, then go Pro for full practice and AI scoring.

See plans on the welcome page

Plans are one-time purchases — no auto-renewal, ever.

Premise: you, today. Conclusion: your score.

Start today. Watch the arguments open up in a week.

No card needed · Start in 30 seconds